- Simultaneous equations are two (or more) equations that must be true at the same time. Their solution is the point where their graphs cross.
- A market equilibrium is exactly that: the price where the quantity buyers want equals the quantity sellers offer.
- Substitution: make one variable the subject and put it into the other equation. Elimination: add or subtract the equations to cancel one variable.
- With one linear and one quadratic equation, substitute the linear one into the quadratic, then solve the quadratic. You may get two, one or no solutions.
- Always check the answer in both equations, and reject solutions that make no sense in context (such as a negative price).
The case: where does the price of a coffee settle?
Picture the market for takeaway coffee in a small city centre on a weekday. Coffee shops will sell more cups if the price is higher, because it is worth opening an extra till or staying open later. Customers will buy fewer cups as the price rises. Suppose market research gives these daily schedules (the numbers are illustrative):
- Demand: \( Q = 900-60P \)
- Supply: \( Q = 150P-360 \)
Here \( P \) is the price of a cup in dollars and \( Q \) is the number of cups per day. The council is also considering a tax of $1.40 on every cup sold, paid by the shops. Two questions follow. What price and quantity will the market settle at now? And after the tax, what will customers pay, what will shops keep, and how much will the council raise?
The concept: two conditions, one point
Each schedule on its own has endless pairs of \( (P, Q) \) that fit it. At $5, buyers want 600 cups; at $8, sellers offer 840 cups. Neither pair is an equilibrium, because buyers and sellers disagree. At equilibrium the same price must give the same quantity on both schedules. So we need the one pair \( (P, Q) \) that satisfies both equations at once. Drawn on a graph, that is where the two lines cross.
Two straight lines can cross once, never (if they are parallel) or everywhere (if they are the same line). So a pair of linear equations has one solution, no solution or infinitely many[5]. Real demand and supply lines slope in opposite directions, so they always cross exactly once.
The formula
For a linear market with demand \( Q = a-bP \) and supply \( Q = -c + dP \), where \( a, b, c, d > 0 \), setting demand equal to supply and solving gives
Here \( a \) is the quantity demanded at a zero price, \( b \) is how many fewer units are bought for each $1 rise in price, \( c \) and \( d \) describe supply in the same way (\( d \) is the extra units offered per $1), and \( P^* \), \( Q^* \) are the equilibrium price and quantity[1]. You do not need to memorise this. It is simply what substitution gives every time, and it is a useful check.
Why this method fits the case
An equilibrium is defined by two conditions holding together: buyers are on their demand schedule, and sellers are on their supply schedule. That is precisely a pair of simultaneous equations. Solving one equation on its own tells you nothing, because it has infinitely many solutions. Only together do they pin down a single price.
Substitution is the natural choice here, because both equations already have \( Q \) as the subject. Elimination is often quicker when the equations are written in the form \( ax + by = c \) with matching coefficients. When there are three or more unknowns, as in a model of several linked markets, the same ideas extend, but matrices or Cramer’s rule become the efficient tool. And when the schedules are curved, the algebra becomes a quadratic or worse, so you must allow for more than one crossing point.
Setting it up
- Unknowns: \( P \) (dollars per cup) and \( Q \) (cups per day).
- Equations: \( Q = 900-60P \) and \( Q = 150P-360 \).
- Domain: \( P > 0 \) and \( Q \ge 0 \). Supply is positive only when \( P > 2.40 \), and demand is positive only when \( P < 15 \), so the answer must lie between those prices.
- The tax: a $1.40 tax on sellers means a shop that charges \( P \) keeps only \( P-1.40 \). Supply depends on what shops keep, so the new supply is \( Q = 150(P-1.40)-360 \).
Solving it
Find the equilibrium price and quantity before the tax.
The market settles at $6 a cup, with 540 cups sold each day.
Find the new equilibrium after a $1.40 tax per cup, the price buyers pay, the price shops keep, and the tax revenue.
The tax raises the price to $7, cuts sales to 480 cups and raises $672 a day for the council.
In a specialist market, supply grows faster at higher prices: \( Q = P^2 + 4P \). Demand is \( Q = 96-6P \). Find the equilibrium.
The equilibrium is a price of $6 and a quantity of 60. In a pure maths question, both solutions would count: the graphs also meet at \( (-16, 192) \).
What the answer tells us
Before the tax, 540 cups change hands at $6. After it, the price buyers pay rises by $1.00, while the amount shops keep falls by only $0.40. The tax is paid by the shops on paper, but most of it is passed on to customers. Who really bears a tax depends on how strongly each side responds to price, not on who sends the money to the council[2].
The numbers explain why. Supply responds by 150 cups per $1, demand by only 60. When the tax pushes the price up, buyers keep buying (they are less responsive), so they carry the larger share: \( \dfrac{150}{60 + 150} = \dfrac57 \) of $1.40, which is exactly $1.00. Shops carry the other \( \dfrac27 \), which is $0.40.
The answers pass a reasonableness check. The new price ($7) is between the old price ($6) and the old price plus the full tax ($7.40). Sales fall, as they should. And the units are right: dollars per cup times cups per day gives dollars per day.
For sensitivity, try a bigger tax. At $2.10 a cup, the same steps give \( P = 7.50 \), \( Q = 450 \) and revenue of $945. Revenue rises, but less than in proportion, because the tax base (cups sold) shrinks as the tax grows. The lost sales, 90 cups at the $1.40 tax, are the source of what economists call the deadweight loss, here \( \tfrac12 \times 1.40 \times 60 = 42 \) dollars a day.
To build a full algebra toolkit before calculus, the Mathematics Made Simple textbook starts from the basics and includes Appendix B, Mathematics for economists. For drill, the Mathematics Made Simple practice questions book has every answer worked in full.
Practice questions
EasyQ1. Solve \( 3x + 2y = 16 \) and \( x-2y = 0 \). Show worked answer
Then \( 4-2y = 0 \), so \( y = 2 \).
Check: \( 3(4) + 2(2) = 16 \). ✓
EasyQ2. Demand is \( Q = 200-4P \) and supply is \( Q = 6P-50 \). Find the equilibrium price and quantity. Show worked answer
\( Q = 200-4(25) = 100 \). Check: \( 6(25)-50 = 100 \). ✓
MediumQ3. A cinema sells adult tickets at $12 and child tickets at $7. One evening it sells 150 tickets for a total of $1,500. How many of each did it sell? Show worked answer
Substitute \( c = 150-a \): \( 12a + 7(150-a) = 1500 \).
\( 12a + 1050-7a = 1500 \), so \( 5a = 450 \) and \( a = 90 \).
So \( c = 60 \). Check: \( 12(90) + 7(60) = 1080 + 420 = 1500 \). ✓
MediumQ4. Find the points where the line \( y = 2x-2 \) meets the curve \( y = x^2-3x + 4 \). Show worked answer
Factorise: \( (x-2)(x-3) = 0 \), so \( x = 2 \) or \( x = 3 \).
\( y = 2(2)-2 = 2 \) and \( y = 2(3)-2 = 4 \).
The points are \( (2, 2) \) and \( (3, 4) \).
ExamQ5. In a market, inverse demand is \( P = 40-0.5Q \) and inverse supply is \( P = 10 + Q \). (a) Find the equilibrium price and quantity. [3] (b) The government pays producers a subsidy of $6 per unit, so inverse supply becomes \( P = 4 + Q \). Find the new quantity, the price consumers pay and the price producers receive. [3] (c) Find the total cost of the subsidy, and how the $6 per unit is shared between consumers and producers. [4] Show worked answer
(b) \( 40-0.5Q = 4 + Q \), so \( 36 = 1.5Q \) and \( Q = 24 \) [1]. Consumers pay \( P = 40-0.5(24) = 28 \) [1]. Producers receive \( 28 + 6 = 34 \) [1].
(c) Cost: \( 6 \times 24 = 144 \) dollars [1]. Consumers pay \( 30-28 = 2 \) dollars less [1]; producers receive \( 34-30 = 4 \) dollars more [1]. So consumers gain $2 and producers $4 of each $6 [1].
Frequently asked questions
Should I use substitution or elimination?
Use substitution when one equation already has a variable as its subject, as with demand and supply in the form \( Q = \dots \). Use elimination when both are in the form \( ax + by = c \) and a coefficient matches, or can be made to match by multiplying. For a linear and a quadratic equation, always substitute.
What if the equations have no solution?
Two linear equations with the same gradient but different intercepts are parallel lines, which never meet. When you solve them, the variables cancel and leave a false statement such as \( 0 = 5 \). If they cancel to \( 0 = 0 \), the equations describe the same line and there are infinitely many solutions.
How many solutions can a linear and a quadratic equation have?
Two, one or none. After substituting, you get a quadratic, and its discriminant \( b^2-4ac \) tells you which: positive gives two crossing points, zero means the line is a tangent, and negative means they do not meet.
Why reject a negative solution?
Algebra does not know that \( P \) is a price. A negative price or quantity is a valid answer to the equations but not to the economic question, so you state it and then reject it with a reason.
References
- Chiang, A.C. and Wainwright, K. (2005) Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics, 4th edn, Chapter 3 “Equilibrium Analysis in Economics”. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Mankiw, N.G. (2021) Principles of Economics, 9th edn, Chapter 6 “Supply, Demand, and Government Policies”. Boston, MA: Cengage.
- Cambridge International (2024) Cambridge International AS & A Level Mathematics 9709: Syllabus for examination in 2026 and 2027, Pure Mathematics 1, topic 1.1 Quadratics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
- International Baccalaureate Organization (2019) Mathematics: analysis and approaches guide (first assessment 2021), AHL 1.16. Cardiff: IBO.
- Abramson, J. (2021) College Algebra 2e, Section 7.1 “Systems of Linear Equations: Two Variables”. Houston, TX: OpenStax. https://openstax.org/details/books/college-algebra-2e

